Why this? Those glyphs exists
What version of Glyphs do you have?
You can’t mix substitutions that include a ’ and substitutions that do not, in the same lookup.
Version 2.6.5 (1312)
This is automatically generated features by Glyphs, do I have to tweak those?
Arg, no, it looks like Georg needs to adjust that again.
Worked using the latest cutting edge version.
I think I fixed that.