I have some questions about the correct setup/naming of Unicodes and the coding of the NLD-IJ features. (Yes, there is a great tutorial, I’m just not sure if I understood it and if it’s right.)
IJ (uni 0132) is not really needed, right?
2a. If I want to create a stylistically adapted variant for the IJ (not ij), then as “I_J.loclNLD” (and I_J.loclNLD.sc and Iacute_J.loclNLD etc.)? (See simulation/sketch with Helvetica.)
2b. Does this cause the IJ to be replaced by the “ligature”/variant in the normal NLD text, but to be split up into its “standard forms” in text with increased spacing? Or should I put this IJ-variant in a style set? (And what would be the correct naming?)
OK thanks, I did. Now all IJ/ij are doubled. So it should work! Or what do you think?
But unfortunately I (still) get the following message when automatically generating the locl-feature: Error: “language-specific behavior already specified (text was “NLD”)” in feature locl in line: 42
[ Glyphs Version 2.6.2 (1264) ]
Sorry, but I can’t find the error/problem: if the locl feature is generated automatically, the same error message still appears and I don’t understand where the problem is - because Glyphs generates the code itself!