Regarding use of .narrow accents, I’m having a problem. I made an ogonek.narrow accent and wish to use it with my lowercase dotlessi.
I edited the GlyphData.xml file to change the regular-width ogonek in both the accents and anchors sections to ogonek.narrow and ogonek_narrow respectively, but only the original regular-width ogonek shows up in the accent cloud. The narrow version does not show in the cloud even when the anchor is selected. My edited entry is the only data entry in the modified file.
The regular-width ogonek shows in the base character in the accent cloud, but in the composite cell the narrow version appears as it should. The only problem I’m having is alignment of the narrow ogonek but that’s easy enough to overcome.
I think what is happening is that the User GlyphData.xml file does not take precedence over the App version, but merely is intended to add to it. Is that correct?
As I said, this isn’t a major problem for me but I would like to understand more about how Glyphs works.
Georg said the .narrow problem I am having has to do with internal implementation, i.e. .narrow support. Although I haven’t tried to use it, since .alt seems to work in the basic alphabet, my question is: will Glyphs recognize, and honor, an accent named with a .alt extension?
Someone might want to have an alternate accent without having to name it .case or .narrow.
Ha ha, I still do not know what you mean by recognize and honor. Sorry, I have worked on kerning all day long. But, yes, you can have accents with a .alt or any other dot extension and they work. You can e.g. bring up Font > Generate Glyphs with a recipe like x+dieresis.alt=xdieresis
Is that what you mean?
The problem with the implementation was only with the cloud preview. You can create actual glyphs from any component with any any suffix. You can check if Glyphs recognizes the name by switching to the list view and check the category column. If it reads “Mark” than everything is fine.
Sorry a little bit off topic. What width do you suggest for narrow marks? The regular accents are all normalized to 600 upm, narrow accents should normalized too? What is your suggestion.
Best regards.