I have a weird problem. Microsoft Word does not kern otf’s exported from Glyphs. (I know kerning in Word needs to be manually activated).
The kerning works in all apps including Word when I do the following:
– Open the otf exported from Glyphs in FontLab
– Inside Fontlab I generate a ‘kern feature’ and finally generate a new otf from FontLab
Can I generate a similar ‘kern feature’ inside Glyphs so that I don’t have to generate it from FontLab afterwards? I did read several topics on the same issue but can’t seem to find a solution. I have no points off curve, all components are decomposed and overlaps have been removed.
Exporting a ttf makes no difference.
The kern table is an outdated way to store kerning information. It cannot store group kerning, and will usually only contain some of the kerning you made in Glyphs. The way it should be done is through the GSUB table. I am still testing, but could not get it to work in Word on Win8.1 yet.
I am wondering what the answer to Torsten’s question is, that kerning in fonts exported from Glyphs does not work in WORD, or that there is a way to fix it?
The thing with that all kerned glyphs need a Unicode value is not true.
When it doesn’t work, it is because the system rejects the font for whatever reason and they can be numerous.
Just a quick note to let you know that I have escalated your question to higher level support, meaning a good friend of ours at the Microsoft type department is having a look at it.
Thank you. The latest font I’ve designed (In Glyphs) works fine in WORD 365 (PC), kerning ligatures and all, but the kerning is off in PowerPoint 365 (PC), even though I’ve turned on ‘Kerning’, it’s just weird.
I really look forward to the development on this topic.
I can’t get my .otf font to display in Word with kerning either.
.otf
651 kerning pairs set in groups
Word for Mac 2011
My paths are very complex due to the nature of the font (a Brush script)
Is there another program to set the kerning feature that will be picked up better by Office to be used in conjunction with Glyphs? (Apart from FLS/Fontographer).
Yes it does. There are always some arbitrary issued. Sometimes it doesn’t like one of your glyphs. Or the kerning table. Or you need some other features or not…