Smart Filters should be Master specific?

[oneweioranother]

@Tosche

It’s useful enough because, in multiple master, the first assumption is that you make things compatible.

Then I would use the incompatibility filter.

@GeorgSeifert

The problem why the some filters are only checking the first layer (and some the whole glyph) is that the visible glyphs would change if you switch masters (that is what @mekkablue meant by loosing selection).

That’s not a problem for me, like I wrote:

@oneweioranother

I can’t think of why I’d need to filter only the first master while looking at another master where the rules may not apply, i.e. I have a “Has Components” rule but in another master it won’t have components — what good is that filter?

I understand @Tosche’s comment about compatibility, but then I would use the incompatibility filter.