Why would a glyph that has been deexported have a name conflict when it is exported?
The glyphs that have been unexported should not be included in the name conflict scope.
The glyphs that have been unexported should not be included in the name conflict scope.
Normally not. What version of Glyphs do you have?
Do you have any Keep/Remove Glyphs parameters?
3.2 (3180)
Can you send me that .glyphs file?
Uploading Mailbox now
It’s in the mailbox.
The problem is that you have a glyph called “presentationformforverticalhorizontalellipsis.001” that has a unicode of FE19. Glyphs will compute a production name for it: “uniFE19” . And a glyphs called “ellipsis.vert”. The second doesn’t have a unicode but it is in the default GlyphData file and gets the production name “uniFE19” from it. So both glyphs end up with the same name. I would remove either one of the two.
but , The glyphs that have been unexported should not be included in the name conflict scope. Should be ignored.
But the two glyphs that produced the conflict for me where set to export.